I thought that there was no need to scan for viruses either in Ubuntu or any Linux distros until I found virus scanner packages 'clamtk' and 'klamav' in Ubuntu. Windows 7 Forums is the largest help and support community, providing friendly help and advice for Microsoft Windows 7 Computers such as Dell, HP, Acer, Asus or a.
- Do any of us really need antivirus software on our Android phones and tablets? In a past life I worked basic tech support at both Best Buy's Geek Squad and Staples.
- Do you need antivirus software on your PC? If you're not sure of the answer to that question, then the short answer is yes. The longer answer is that security.
- Antivirus software is must-have protection. This review picks the best antivirus software for Windows based on its malware detection scores in independent antivirus.
- Do you need Linux antivirus software? The answer is more than a simple yes or no.
Why You Don’t Need to Run Manual Antivirus Scans (And When You Do)Do you regularly open your antivirus program and run scans? Microsoft Security Essentials and other antivirus programs think you need to, warning you that your computer may be at risk if you haven’t done so in a while. In reality, these manual scans aren’t all they’re cracked up to be. You can generally ignore your antivirus and it will do its job in the background without any help from you, only alerting you when it finds a problem. Why Manual Antivirus Scans Are Unnecessary.
Your antivirus is always running in the background. It’s monitoring the processes running on your system, ensuring that no malicious processes are running. Whenever you download a new file or open a program, your antivirus quickly steps in, examining the file and comparing it to viruses before allowing it to run.
If you download a virus, your antivirus will notice without you needing to scan anything. For example, try downloading the EICAR test file — your antivirus will leap into action and deal with the file without any manual scans needed. This feature is generally known as background scanning, real- time protection, resident protection, on- demand scanning, or something like that. In other words, you don’t need to run manual scans because your antivirus has already checked every file for malware as it arrived.
It’s also aware of all the software running on your system. Your antivirus program doesn’t need you to click a button — it’s already doing the work.
Your antivirus probably already runs its own manual scans, anyway. Antiviruses generally run system scans in the background once a week without interrupting you. Microsoft Security Essentials’ message is particularly silly. If MSE really thinks a manual scan is necessary, MSE has the ability to perform the scan in the background instead of scaring its users into clicking a button. When You Should Run Manual Scans. Manual scans are still useful in some cases, but you don’t need to regularly open your antivirus program and initiate them: When You Install an Antivirus: When you first install an antivirus, it will perform a full- system scan immediately.
This allows the antivirus to ensure your computer is in a clean state and that you don’t have viruses lurking in unopened files on your hard drive. After performing this scan, your antivirus can trust that your system is secure. However, it will still scan files for malware when you open them. Check For Dormant Malware it Missed Earlier: Antiviruses use “definition files,” which are updated regularly. These files basically contain a catalogue of identified malware, and your antivirus compares programs you run to the catalogue to check whether they match.
It’s possible that there’s a dormant virus lurking in an executable file deep on your hard drive that your antivirus missed during its first manual scan. If a virus definition has been added for that type a malware — or the antivirus’ heuristics have improved — it will only catch the dormant virus when you perform a manual scan. However, the virus will be caught if you try to run the file containing the virus or during a regularly scheduled full- system scan. Get a Second Opinion: You should only have one antivirus program running at once, as multiple background- scanning antivirus programs can interfere with each other and cause problems with your computer. If you want to scan your computer with multiple antivirus programs, you’ll need to perform a manual scan with the second antivirus program instead of using its background- scanning feature. Why Background Protection is Better Than Manual Scans. You can optionally disable background scanning in some antivirus programs and just perform manual scans, but you shouldn’t.
Think of your computer as your house, and your antivirus’s background scanning protection as a security guard standing at your front door and frisking everyone who tries to enter your house. A manual scan is the equivalent of having the security guard search every inch of your house for intruders. If you’ve already checking everyone who enters your house, you don’t need to search every nook and cranny of your house for malicious people. In fact, it’s much better to guard your door because so you can catch threats before they’re allowed in — if you catch someone lurking in a dark corner of your house or PC, who knows what they’ve been doing in the time between when they were allowed in and when you caught them.
Once the software is running on your computer, it also has the potential to hide itself and prevent the antivirus program — and even the Windows Task Manager — from seeing that it’s running. Software that does this is generally known as a rootkit. You want to catch the malware before the virus starts running on (and infects) your computer, so stick with automatic background scanning instead of manual scans.
Even if you scan every program you download manually before running it, you should use automatic scans to get maximum protection against zero- day attacks and other security threats. Some security suites may remove cookies when you perform a manual scan, referring to them as “threats.” This is a great way for the security suite to pretend it’s doing something valuable and justify its price tag. But you don’t need a full security suite, anyway — and you can always have your browser automatically clear cookies if you want to get rid of them.
Do I need to have 'antivirus software' installed? No, you do not need an Antivirus (AV) on Ubuntu to keep it secure. You need to employ other "good hygene" precautions, but contrary to some of the misleading answers and comments posted here, Anti- virus is not among them. For starters, there seems to be a confusion in some of the top- rated answers here between two issues: Existence of viruses for Linux and. Ability to actually infect a system. These two are not the same.
There definitely are 'viruses' that can run on Linux, but in order to make them run, a malicious user needs to get someone with local privilege to actively install them. This requires the owner of the system to trust the malicious user, download the software, and use sudo with a password to install it, (or run it as himself to cause some regular- user level damage). Not a trivial set of barriers to overcome. Unlike on some other systems, a regular user who keeps his Ubuntu system up- to- date on security fixes (very easy to do), cannot normally install something by accident (e. The exception is unknown zero- day vulnerabilities, but for those AV will be totally ineffective anyway.
A Ubuntu user doesn't run with admin privileges by default, and remote root logins are disabled. In addition, Ubuntu comes with: Random address loading (foils most drop to shell attempts)Application restrictions/barriers via apparmor so an application like firefox can only access a very restricted subset of files and actions for example (see /etc/apparmor. Built in firewall (iptables) which can be set- up to be very restrictive. So to be secure, you need to adhere to basic rules of safety such as: Keep your software up to date.
Only run software downloaded from official repositories (or software you wrote yourself, or can audit the source code of)Only use your standard package- manager for installs. In particular do not install proprietary binary stuff from random sources which you can't audit by looking at the source code using apt- get source). Have a home firewall & do not run unnecessary services. Reguarly run some log scanning to detect unusual activity (I recommend logcheck)Add a local iptables based firewall for another defense perimeter layer.
Keep your passwords long and secure (a good password manager is recommended). Also use two- factor authentication wherever possible. Use encrypted sessions (use ssh and scp, and not ftp or telnet)And similar good habits along these lines.
If you do, you'd be way safer than you would be by installing an non- opensource 'Anti. Virus' (how can you trust such software?) and falling into a false, and highly deluded, sense of security. Of course, if a malicious user asks you to download badstuff. An Anti. Virus is pretty unlikely to save you in this case. Unless this particular badstuff. As others have mentioned clamav "for Linux" is chiefly designed as a scanning server to other (non Linux) systems.
Some of the answers and comments here make the following non- sequitur claim: since a user- level damage can be very harmful (e. HOME and everything under it), sudo access is irrelevant to the need for AV. This is an obvious fallacy since you can accidentally or willfully remove $HOME anyway, with a "virus" or not. The issue and critical question, is again: do you run random code from untrusted sources or not. If you do, AV (or any other precaution) won't save you from yourself willingly damaging your system. On Ubuntu the whole system and software repository eco- system is designed to prevent running random code from random sources, thus installing an AV to "protect Ubuntu from viruses" is a waste of time and resources. Some answers here suggest installing a commercial, non- open source, AV software on Linux.
Don't do this. AV software runs with elevated privileges, often changes system- call semantics (e. CPU, disk, network) resources. Such software cannot be audited so it is hard to trust. Installing such software on your otherwise pretty secure Linux system, would dramatically increase the surface of attack of your system and make it far less secure. References: Are signature based antivirus or anti- malware effective? What automated intrusion detection and notification are good for destop use?
Is it easier to write viruses for Windows compared to OS- X and Linux (Quora).